
Werner van Rossum is a senior finance and enterprise transformation leader with experience leading large-scale initiatives at the intersection of data, technology, and performance management in complex global organizations. His work has focused on enterprise finance transformation, including reporting and analytics modernization, integrated operating model design, data harmonization, and decision-support capabilities.
With a global career spanning Europe, the Middle East, and the United States, Werner has led multi-year finance and performance management transformations in highly complex environments, aligning planning, governance, and analytics capabilities to support executive decision-making at scale. His experience includes enterprise FP&A modernization, S/4HANA finance transformation, and the design of data foundations supporting advanced analytics and AI-enabled decision support.
Werner contributes professional thought leadership on topics including enterprise finance transformation, performance management, data strategy, and governance in large organizations.
Additional background and selected publications are available at https://v-rossum.com
| Werner van Rossum | Points |
|---|---|
| Academic | 42 |
| Author | 11 |
| Influencer | 10 |
| Speaker | 13 |
| Entrepreneur | 20 |
| Total | 96 |
Points based upon Thinkers360 patent-pending algorithm.
Tags: Change Management, Leadership, Personal Branding
Tags: Business Strategy, Change Management, Leadership
Master of Science - MS, International Business - Accounting and Finance
Tags: Finance, GRC, Transformation
Tags: Finance, GRC, Management
Tags: Finance, Leadership, Transformation
Tags: Finance, Leadership, Transformation
Designing FP&A for Decision Advantage: A Framework for Processes, Systems, and Skills at Enterprise Scale
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
When Planning Detail Starts to Undermine Strategy
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Outcome-Driven Planning: How Global Enterprises Can Align Business Plans With Strategy
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
The Clarity Crisis: The Anatomy of a High Impact Financial Story
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
The Clarity Crisis: The Anatomy of a High-Impact Financial Story
Tags: Business Strategy, Finance, Transformation
The Clarity Crisis: Why Modern Finance Is Drowning in Data but Starving for Insight
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Turning Data Into Decisions: The Art of Finance Storytelling
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Business Venture Manager - Performance Management (Plan to Perform)
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Tags: Digital Transformation, Leadership, Transformation
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Tags: Finance, GRC, Transformation
Tags: Transformation
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Why FP&A Breaks at Scale - and How to Design It for Decision Advantage
In many large organizations, FP&A is expected to do more than ever before. Beyond budgeting and variance analysis, it is asked to support strategy execution, inform capital allocation, and provide forward-looking insight in increasingly volatile environments.
Yet at enterprise scale, the outcome is often paradoxical.
Despite heavy investment in tools, data platforms, and reporting capabilities, FP&A teams frequently find themselves overwhelmed by volume rather than empowered by clarity. Analysts spend significant time reconciling numbers, explaining discrepancies, and preparing extensive materials, while senior leaders receive more information than they can realistically absorb or act on. The result is a function that is operationally busy, yet strategically constrained.
In my experience, this is rarely a talent problem or a technology problem. More often, it is a design problem.
This article builds on my recent publication in the World Financial Review, where I introduced an integrated framework for designing Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) as a source of decision advantage at enterprise scale. Here, I expand on the practical implications of that framework and explore why traditional FP&A models tend to break down as organizations grow in size and complexity.
A recurring issue in large FP&A organizations is that success is implicitly measured by analytical sophistication or reporting completeness. More models, more scenarios, more dashboards are assumed to equate to better decisions.
In practice, that assumption often fails.
What ultimately matters is not how much analysis is produced, but whether insight reaches decision-makers in time, with credibility, and in a form that is directly relevant to the decision at hand. I refer to this capability as decision advantage.
Decision advantage is not synonymous with forecasting accuracy or advanced analytics. Highly accurate forecasts that arrive after decisions are locked in, or insights that are not trusted due to inconsistent definitions, do little to shape outcomes. At scale, decision advantage emerges only when information production is intentionally linked to decision execution.
Viewing FP&A through a decision-advantage lens shifts the transformation question. Instead of asking how to optimize individual components, the focus becomes how to design FP&A as an integrated enterprise capability.
I find it useful to frame this design challenge around three interdependent pillars:
Processes - how decisions are structured, sequenced, and governed
Systems - how data, calculation logic, and analytics are enabled and scaled
Skills - how people interpret information, exercise judgment, and influence outcomes
At enterprise scale, none of these elements can be optimized in isolation. Improving tools without redesigning decision processes often shifts effort from analysis to reconciliation. Standardizing processes without investing in professional judgment increases control at the expense of insight. Developing talent without fixing system fragmentation limits impact.
Decision advantage emerges only when these pillars are deliberately aligned.
As organizations grow larger and more complex, decision latency and fragmentation tend to increase. Governance layers multiply, local requirements accumulate, and analytical effort drifts toward explaining the past rather than shaping future choices. What works in a single business unit rarely scales cleanly across a global, multi-business enterprise.
Designing FP&A for decision advantage is therefore not a technical exercise. It is a leadership choice about what the organization chooses to plan, measure, review, and escalate - and just as importantly, what it chooses to stop doing.
For a deeper, structured treatment of this framework, the full article is available via the World Financial Review: Designing Enterprise FP&A for Decision Advantage - The World Financial Review
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
When Planning Detail Starts to Undermine Strategy
In many organizations, planning gradually shifts from a strategy-led exercise to a detailed operational negotiation. As assumptions multiply and templates expand, strategic intent remains referenced but no longer leads decision-making.
This article examines why excessive detail introduced too early can undermine strategy, how planning processes often conflate long-term strategic alignment with short-term operational accuracy, and why effective planning works in the opposite order. It also explores how digital transformation, when grounded in clear strategic anchors and sound data foundations, can support better planning by enabling faster scenario analysis without accelerating confusion.
The organizations that plan well are not those with the most granular forecasts, but those that preserve strategic clarity throughout the planning process, using detail to inform decisions rather than replace them.
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Data Isn’t the Problem. Alignment Is.
Many organizations believe they have a data problem. In reality, they have an alignment problem.
I’ve seen companies invest heavily in modern platforms, dashboards, and analytics - yet still struggle to make timely decisions. The issue isn’t data quality or technology capability. It’s that each function defines success differently.
Real transformation happens when organizations move to a single performance model: one KPI framework, one source of truth, and one shared interpretation.
When alignment replaces fragmentation, decision velocity increases more than any additional technology investment ever could.
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Strategy Fails When It Becomes a Spreadsheet Exercise
A lot of organizations think they have a strategy issue, but more often it’s a planning issue.
If your annual plan starts with last year’s numbers, you’re already negotiating against your own ambition.
When planning turns into a routine of templates, historical run rates, and incremental tweaks, strategy quietly moves to the background.
Outcome-driven planning changes that. Start with the outcomes you actually want, agree on the few decisions that matter, and build the plan around those choices.
It sounds simple, but it forces clarity and real alignment. Most importantly, it keeps leaders focused on where the business needs to go — not where it happened to be last year.
Tags: Digital Transformation, Finance, Transformation
Location: Virtual, in person globally Fees: By invitation
Service Type: Service Offered
Designing FP&A for Decision Advantage: A Framework for Processes, Systems, and Skills at Enterprise Scale
When Planning Detail Starts to Undermine Strategy
Rewiring Global Finance - Interview with Werner van Rossum
Why FP&A Breaks at Scale - and How to Design It for Decision Advantage
When Planning Detail Starts to Undermine Strategy
Data Isn’t the Problem. Alignment Is.