Most organizations I work with have a continuity plan. Backups. Failover sites. A succession chart in a binder somewhere.

Very few have a continuity plan for the leadership team itself.

That's the gap. After a round of layoffs or a sudden CEO exit, the systems usually hold. The servers stay up. Payroll runs. What wobbles is the small group of people who are supposed to steer through it.

I have been in rooms with senior leaders since 1996. I have watched teams come out of a shock sharper than they went in. I have watched others look fine on paper and quietly stall for a year. The difference was rarely strategy. It was what happened inside the team in the first 90 days.

The Real Continuity Risk

When a shock hits, five things start slipping at once.

Trust. People start reading every meeting for signals. Who got consulted. Who didn't.

Clarity. The old priorities are still on the wall. Nobody believes them anymore.

Who's in the room. Seats changed. Some voices left. New ones arrived without context. The informal network that actually moved work is broken.

Decision rights. The person who used to make the call is gone, or the new leader hasn't said who decides what. So decisions float upward. Or they don't get made at all.

Energy. The people who stayed are tired, guilty, or quietly looking. Often all three.

None of this shows up on a dashboard. All of it shows up in execution, usually a quarter late.

What the Research Tells Us

This isn't just a coach's hunch. Amy Edmondson's research on psychological safety found that teams learn and perform better when members believe it is safe to speak up, ask questions, and admit mistakes (Edmondson, 1999, Administrative Science Quarterly). Google's Project Aristotle studied what made its own teams effective. Psychological safety came out on top, alongside dependability, structure and clarity, meaning, and impact (Google re:Work).

Now look at what a shock does. Layoffs signal that speaking up might be risky. A transition scrambles roles and expectations. The exact conditions that make a team work are the first ones to break.

That's why the team needs its own plan.

Five Moves for the First 90 Days

1. Name what happened. Out loud.
Teams don't move past what they won't discuss. The senior leader goes first. Say what changed, what you know, what you don't, and when you'll know more. Skip the spin. People can smell it from the parking lot.

2. Reset the table.
Who's in the room now? Decide it on purpose. Name the core leadership group for the next 90 days. Bring new members up to speed on history, not just the org chart. Under pressure, leaders shrink the circle to the people they're comfortable with. That feels safe. It costs you the information you need most.

3. Redraw decision rights.
Write down the ten decisions that matter most this quarter. Next to each one, a single name. Who decides. Who gets consulted. Who gets informed. Confusion about who decides is the fastest way to lose a quarter. It's also the cheapest problem to fix.

4. Narrow to three priorities.
Not seven. Three. Then pause or stop the rest, and say so publicly. A smaller team carrying the old workload isn't a strategy. It's attrition on a timer. Clarity at the point of pressure isn't about having every answer. It's about making the next right move obvious to everyone.

5. Manage energy like a resource.
Set a short weekly leadership check-in. Three questions. What's working. What's stuck. What aren't we saying. Then watch your strongest people. They are absorbing the extra load, and they are the first ones recruiters call. Ask them directly how they're doing. Mean it.

Where Technical Experts Get Caught

Here's a pattern I see often. A strong functional leader gets pulled up to the top table in the middle of the disruption. A head of engineering becomes interim COO. A controller steps into the CFO seat.

They do what made them great. They solve problems themselves. They go deep.

That instinct is exactly wrong right now. The job is no longer to be the best expert in the room. It's to make the room work. If you just made that jump, your first question each morning isn't "What do I need to fix?" It's "What does this team need to see from me today?"

Questions to Ask on Monday

Take these into your next leadership meeting. Have each person answer on their own first. Then compare.

1. Can everyone here name our top three priorities for the next 90 days, in the same order?
2. For our five biggest open decisions, do we agree on who makes the call?
3. Who is missing from this room who should be here? Who is here out of habit?
4. What is the thing we all know and nobody has said in this meeting?
5. Which of our people are we most at risk of losing in the next six months? Has anyone talked to them?
6. Are we spending more time reassuring each other or deciding?

If the answers don't match, that's not failure. That's your agenda.

The Bottom Line

Systems give you continuity of operations. Leadership teams give you continuity of direction.

You can restore a server from a backup. You can't restore trust from a backup.

The first 90 days decide what kind of team you'll have on day 365. Treat the team as the thing you're protecting. Because it is.

Direction. Not just motion.

---

Dean Miles is Founder and President of Bridgepoint Coaching & Strategy Group and has been an executive coach to senior leaders for 30 years. If your team is heading into a transition, or still finding its footing after one, let's talk. Connect with Dean at deanmiles.com.

By Dean Miles

Keywords: Business Continuity, Coaching, Leadership

Follow Us On

Become a Contributor Newsletter Signup