People love labels. They make chaos seem orderly. They give us shortcuts that feel like strategies.

Call your PMO a “Strategic PMO,” and it sounds elevated. Call it “Agile,” and it feels fast and modern. Say “TMO” or “VMO,” and suddenly it signals transformation, or value.

But here’s the trap: when you define your PMO by a label, you’re not designing. You’re defaulting. And in far too many organizations, that default becomes a box that limits how the PMO sees itself and how others expect it to behave.

Let’s unpack why that happens and how high-performing PMOs break free.

---

PMO Insight

Your PMO is not a type. It’s a solution. And every solution must be custom-built.

PMO types are not design strategies. They’re mental shortcuts; attempts to make the complex simple. Supportive. Controlling. Directive. Strategic. Agile. TMO. VMO. They sound neat. But reality is messy.

One of the most common and costly mistakes PMOs make is choosing a type before understanding real needs.

It feels strategic and looks decisive. But what you’ve really done is select a box full of assumptions before you've even discovered what your customers actually need.

You’ve already committed to:

• Which services you’ll offer.
• How they’ll be delivered.
• What role the PMO will play.
• How success will be measured.

All of this before listening. Before diagnosing. Before understanding PMO customer maturity or expected outcomes.

It’s like walking into a pharmacy, grabbing the most popular medication, and hoping it’ll fix your symptoms, without even describing what’s wrong.

---

Spark Box

The Myth of PMO Types

Do these sound familiar to you?

“We’re a Controlling PMO, but we’ve recently transitioned into a VMO.”

“We operate as a Strategic PMO, but what we really need is a TMO.”

Sounds confident and bold. But in reality, it’s just branding wrapped in wishful thinking.

These labels offer the illusion of clarity. They suggest your PMO has found its identity when in reality, it’s surrendering to a prepackaged script.

Let’s take a closer look:

Supportive, Controlling, Directive? These are not PMO types. They are approaches to service delivery, and as the PMI PMO Practice Guide suggests, they should never apply to the PMO as a whole.

They should vary by service, and even by customer:

• A mature project team might need supportive coaching.
• Unexperienced project managers may need tighter, more controlled planning support.
• More mature IT project managers usually just need clear direction on what to do.

Rigidly applying one approach across all PMO services and customers? That’s not consistency. That’s inflexibility. And inflexibility is the enemy of PMO relevance.

Now consider the trendier acronyms:

• A VMO (Value Management Office) is simply a PMO that emphasizes value realization, which should be the core mission of every PMO, whether it’s strategic, tactical, or operational.
• A Strategic PMO aspires to operate at a higher level, but most end up managing tactical and operational firefights too, because their customers need that.
• A TMO (Transformation Management Office) is just a PMO focused on a transformation portfolio.

 

The danger? Once you adopt a label, it starts dictating your decisions: who you serve, how you work, and even what you think you’re allowed to do.

PMO types don’t clarify your purpose. They confuse identity with impact.

Let me be clear: I’m not saying that everything written about PMO types is useless. Far from it.

If you pick up some of the best books on PMOs or listen to some of the most respected consultants in our field, you’ll undoubtedly find a variety of proposed PMO “types.” Different names, different structures, different focuses.

And here’s the tricky thing: they’re NOT wrong.

Each of these models represents a valid and honest perspective. They reflect the lived experience of individuals or groups who have worked hard to make sense of their context. And while those perspectives may not be statistically universal, they still offer valuable insights.

So no, we shouldn't discard them. However, we should also not follow them blindly. These models aren’t blueprints. They’re inspiration.

By the way, even the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition proposed PMO types. However, the upcoming Eighth Edition, already aligned with the PMI PMO Practice Guide, adopts a more modern, adaptive, and customer-centered mindset. One that views PMO types as useful references, rather than predefined models to be followed.

So, how should we approach them? Think of each “type” as a different box. Instead of jumping into one and locking the lid, open them all. Look inside. Examine each item, each service, and each delivery approach. Ask yourself:

• Will this serve my PMO customers?
• Will this meet the needs of my organization?
• Can this be adapted and tailored (not just adopted) in my context?

Because that’s the whole point: every PMO is different (and must be different!) to be truly successful.

So, yes, draw from the knowledge that is out there. Be curious. Be informed. But in the end, design a PMO that fits your reality, not someone else’s box.

---

From the Field

What They Call Themselves vs. What They Actually Do

I recently worked with three PMOs, all from different industries and regions. Here’s what they called themselves: TMO, VMO, Strategic PMO.

Three labels. Three promises of elevation. But behind the scenes?

The TMO was managing a set of transformation initiatives; however, the service portfolio was almost identical to that of a "traditional PMO." The only real difference? A shift in focus, not in function. A TMO is just a PMO with a focused portfolio.

The VMO had a fresh new brand and an arsenal of benefit realization reports. But stakeholders weren’t engaged. Why? Because “value” had never been defined by them. They were receiving dashboards, not solutions. A VMO is a PMO with a value narrative.

The Strategic PMO had a strong presence in board-level meetings but was overwhelmed with operational demands. The team resisted helping at that level, fearing it would “dilute” their strategic image. That reluctance cost them credibility and trust. A Strategic PMO is a PMO focused on strategic services with high ambitions.

Different names. Same trap.

All three started with a label, and all three ended up constrained by it.

So next time someone says, “We’re building a [type] PMO,” ask them: Is the name helping you think clearly, or limiting what you believe is possible?

---

Final Provocation

If your PMO vanished tomorrow, what would be missed?

A name? A structure? A few dashboards and templates?

Or would your customers feel the loss of a partner they depend on to deliver clarity, confidence, and results?

Of course, you can call your PMO whatever you like. But remember, the label won’t define its essence, and it certainly won’t determine its success.

No label has ever saved a PMO from irrelevance. Recognition comes from relevance. Earned through trust, not titles.

So stop trying to fit your PMO into someone else’s box. Design what your organization actually needs. Deliver it in a way that adapts to each PMO customer. And build a PMO that no one wants to work without.

Because when a PMO gets that right, the question isn’t: “What type is it?” It’s: “How did we ever work without them?”

---

Until next post, Break the box. Build what matters.

Americo Pinto, PMI-PMOCP, PMP | PMOGA Managing Director at PMI

By Americo Pinto

Keywords: Business Strategy, Project Management

Follow Us On

Become a Contributor Newsletter Signup