One of the biggest misconceptions about succession planning is that every person on the succession chart is expected to step into a leadership role tomorrow.

They're not.

In fact, one of the healthiest signs of a mature succession planning process is recognizing that different people are on different timelines.

Some leaders are nearly ready today. Others may need several years of development before they are prepared for greater responsibility. Both groups are essential to the future of the organization.

The mistake many companies make is treating every successor the same.

A succession plan should distinguish between immediate successors and long-term pipeline candidates.

Both are critical to organizational success.

An immediate successor is someone who could assume a critical leadership position with little disruption if the role suddenly became vacant. They understand the business, have demonstrated sound judgment, possess credibility with employees, and have already been exposed to many of the responsibilities they'll inherit.

They may not know every detail of the new job, but they have shown they can learn quickly and make good decisions under pressure.

Think of these leaders as your business continuity strategy.

If your CEO, COO, or Vice President unexpectedly resigns, retires, or becomes unavailable, these are the individuals who keep the organization moving forward.

Long-term pipeline candidates serve a different purpose.

These are the emerging leaders who consistently demonstrate potential but still need experience before assuming enterprise-level responsibility.

Perhaps they are exceptional functional leaders but have never managed across departments. Maybe they excel at execution but have had limited exposure to financial strategy, customers, acquisitions, or executive decision-making.

Their potential is real.

Their readiness simply isn't there yet.

That distinction is one of the most valuable conversations leadership teams can have.

Too often, organizations confuse high performance with readiness.

Someone can be the best sales manager, engineer, controller, or operations leader in the company and still not be prepared to lead the business.

Readiness is measured by demonstrated capability.

Potential is measured by the ability to grow into future capability.

Those are not the same thing.

This is why I encourage clients to think about succession planning across multiple time horizons.

Who could step into this role today?

Who could be ready in one to two years?

Who has the potential to be ready in three to five years?

Answering those questions changes how leadership development is prioritized.

Immediate successors should receive experiences that refine executive judgment, strengthen strategic thinking, and expose any remaining development gaps before they assume larger responsibilities.

Long-term pipeline candidates need broader developmental opportunities. Cross-functional assignments, mentoring, stretch projects, leadership coaching, customer exposure, and participation in executive discussions all help accelerate their growth.

Neither group should be ignored.

Organizations that focus only on immediate successors create may feel they’re prepared - but eventually they’ll run out of prepared leaders.

Organizations that focus only on emerging talent often discover they have no one ready when an unexpected vacancy occurs and are forced into hiring externally.

Strong succession planning requires both depth and breadth.

Depth means having multiple candidates capable of filling critical positions in the near term.

Breadth means continually developing the next generation of leaders who will sustain the organization for years to come.

The strongest succession plans are not built around names.

They are built around time horizons.

When leadership teams understand the difference between immediate successors and long-term pipeline candidates, development becomes more intentional, investments become more strategic, and leadership transitions become far less disruptive.

Succession planning isn't simply about answering the question, "Who's next?"

By Nanette Miner, Ed.D.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship, HR, Leadership

Follow Us On

Become a Contributor Newsletter Signup